ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?

2009-05-08 05:35:53
On 5/8/09 7:07 AM, Dave CROCKER wrote:

I hadn't noticed anyone suggesting doing anything that cycled the 
specification
at Proposed.  (The requirement placed on the Errata is different than we're
discussing for the -bis effort.)

Have you heard otherwise?

   

That would be me.  Refer to recent messages, please.  The standard, 
IMHO, is not sufficiently baked, given the recent change.

Eliot
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html