On 5/8/09 7:07 AM, Dave CROCKER wrote:
I hadn't noticed anyone suggesting doing anything that cycled the
specification
at Proposed. (The requirement placed on the Errata is different than we're
discussing for the -bis effort.)
Have you heard otherwise?
That would be me. Refer to recent messages, please. The standard,
IMHO, is not sufficiently baked, given the recent change.
Eliot
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html