ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?

2009-05-04 15:30:42
On 5/4/09 9:17 PM, Jeff Macdonald wrote:
2.  On whether to move to draft standard

While I was initially in favor of this, I am now uncomfortable doing 
so,
based on the lengthy debate we just concluded about errata.  To me the

Qualified approval based on consensus gained in the -bis draft.


If I understand Suresh correctly, that the Standard draft would be 
based on
bis, +1.

Confusion has set in.  One moves to draft standard when the proposed 
standard has been stable for at least six months.  Given that we just 
essentially updated it, we can't possibly claim that.

Eliot


_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html