I'd like to break these into two points:
1. On whether to do rfc4871bis at all
I tend to agree with Tony that we should do a -bis to clean up the
errata. If scoped as such it should be a very brief operation, taking
no more than 6 months.
2. On whether to move to draft standard
While I was initially in favor of this, I am now uncomfortable doing so,
based on the lengthy debate we just concluded about errata. To me the
changes made by the document we just approved were sufficient enough to
warrant all manner of process. What's more, in that process we made
some conceptual distinctions that I believe have not yet withstood the
test of time. We are not ready for draft.
I would recycle at proposed, if we are going to do anything at all.
Eliot
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html