Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis p

On May 20, 2009, at 3:57 PM, Michael Thomas wrote:

> Steve Atkins wrote:
> > Remember that we're considering the content of the message as   
> > displayed to the end user here,
>  No we're not. That has never been in the scope of the DKIM effort.
Even if it weren't section 8.1 of the existing RFC, it's pretty  
obvious that a security issue that allows an attacker to create a  
validly signed email with their own content without access to the  
associated private key would be in scope for discussion.

Cheers,
   Steve

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html