Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis p

Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:

Indeed, Outlook will opt to render an HTML part over a text part whenever 
given the choice.  Thus, if you sign only the text/plain portion [...]



Seriously: how signers and receivers use DKIM information is >>>>WAY<<<<
outside of the scope of this working group. To read the hand wringing here
you'd think that spam filter writers are complete idiots. They aren't.

                Mike
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, (continued) Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Michael Thomas Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Steve Atkins Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Michael Thomas Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Steve Atkins Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Michael Thomas Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Steve Atkins Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Michael Thomas Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Hector Santos Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, SM Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Murray S. Kucherawy Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Michael Thomas <= Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Douglas Otis Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Eliot Lear Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Eliot Lear Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Dave CROCKER Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Eliot Lear Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Dave CROCKER Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Eliot Lear Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Dave CROCKER Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Michael Thomas Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Eliot Lear

Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process