Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis p

Dave CROCKER wrote:

And by the way, my original question was about who is using the feature and 
finding it valuable.  Not about theoretical scenarios, but experience based 
on 
two years of possible use.


The archives are your friends. This has been stated innumerable times
with real-life statistics.

                Mike
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, (continued) Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Murray S. Kucherawy Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Michael Thomas Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Douglas Otis Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Eliot Lear Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Eliot Lear Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Dave CROCKER Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Eliot Lear Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Dave CROCKER Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Eliot Lear Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Dave CROCKER Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Michael Thomas <= Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Eliot Lear Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Douglas Otis Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Charles Lindsey Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, John Levine Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Doug Otis Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, John Levine Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Hector Santos Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Bill.Oxley Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, John Levine Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process, Eliot Lear

Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process