On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 12:22 AM, Michael Thomas <mike(_at_)mtcc(_dot_)com>
wrote:
This is exactly why reopening this at this point is a stupid and
dangerous idea. There is nothing to be gained by this kind of
discussion except mass confusion, and making perfectly compliant
deployments broken.
You can actually construct quite a rube goldberg machine with ALL the
dkim options currently.
Wouldnt hurt to trim fat unless you find useful operational cases for
those .. rather than theoretical situations.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html