ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?

2009-05-09 15:26:47
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 12:22 AM, Michael Thomas <mike(_at_)mtcc(_dot_)com> 
wrote:
This is exactly why reopening this at this point is a stupid and
dangerous idea. There is nothing to be gained by this kind of
discussion except mass confusion, and making perfectly compliant
deployments broken.

You can actually construct quite a rube goldberg machine with ALL the
dkim options currently.

Wouldnt hurt to trim fat unless you find useful operational cases for
those .. rather than theoretical situations.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>