Michael Thomas wrote:
Wietse Venema wrote:
John Levine:
with some editorial changes I guess. I've not seen anyone
suggest that we add features or remove a raft of features
or make other substantial changes.
I'm with Steve, I'd like to deprecate the useless stuff.
I too am in favor of less complexity. We could start by
keeping only the attributes that must always be sent.
Talk about snatching defeat from the jaws of victory.
This is exactly why reopening this at this point is a stupid and
dangerous idea. There is nothing to be gained by this kind of
discussion except mass confusion, and making perfectly compliant
deployments broken.
Thats what happens when you have mixed disciplines and a rough
consensus by osmosis decision making process.
--
Sincerely
Hector Santos
http://www.santronics.com
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html