ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered: sha1 vs sha256

2009-05-09 22:14:21
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 6:19 AM, Tony Hansen <tony(_at_)att(_dot_)com> wrote:

I'm not sure we can downgrade verifier support for sha1. However, I
definitely agree that we could downgrade signing support for sha1.


+1

I dont see verifier support for sha-1 going away for quite a while due
to legacy installations.   Downgrading or entirely removing (except if
a flag is explicitly set, say) SHA-1 signing is certainly an option.

thanks
--srs

-- 
Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops(_dot_)lists(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com)
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>