Re: [ietf-dkim] The "real" (remaining) errata

> already "nodded in agreement" to a number of the non-controversial
> errata, and we had discussed that at IETF 73.  What's the process to
> clear the obvious ones?
Checking...

Barry

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html