Wietse Venema wrote:
Michael Thomas:
I just don't get it. It seems to me that people who are advocating
changing the spec are doing it in a complete vacuum of the wide
deployment out there. Is DKIM broken? Manifestly not even a little
which is quite remarkable.
Every single suggestion has been debated in the past, and every
suggestion if adopted would cause a wave of incompatibility
problems. Any supposed "simplification" of the spec would be
radically outweighed by dealing with the complexity of those
incompatibilities. So "simplification" is not a valid argument.
So what is the real motivation here? Is the real intent to cripple
further deployment? Or maybe people don't have enough to do with
their day jobs? Or maybe the thrill of making dev managers lives
suck is just irresistible?
If not, what?
This is not a discussion. This is an accusation. I will not play
your game, and I can only hope that others won't either.
I am offended too with you continued idiotic proposals to destabilized
a RFC protocol and the WG make people take sides, and quite frankly,
you are the only one who has cursed people out, telling people to
SHUT THE F%^K UP. Don't be posing like you are anything close to being
civilized - you are far from it.
Mr. Thomas has all the right to express his views and discomfort with
whats going on.
As far as I am concern, you are a one principle reasons why POLICY was
ruined and now its going to happen to the BASE protocol.
How do you like those apples?
--
Sincerely
Hector Santos
http://www.santronics.com
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html