Barry Leiba wrote:
Pasi is putting draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-10 on the 4 June telechat. But...
This version has added registry entries for RFC 5451
(Authentication-Results), which had been removed from that document to
avoid having its publication block on a reference-wait from ADSP.
Only, I can't find any discussion that the WG had about making that
change.
While I think this change will not likely fuel any controversy, we
can't publish this without having it approved by the working group.
So, ASAP, please:
1. If someone can find documentation of WG discussion about this, reply here.
To my knowledge, there was no WG discussion about this. John Levine
pointed out the change to the co-editors of the draft on March 31,
noting that this makes the dependencies between RFC 5451 and ADSP match
the timing of their publication, and that this shouldn't be
controversial. I agree.
2. If anyone objects to its inclusion (see sections 5.3 and 5.4 of
draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-10), reply here.
Just to be thorough, I'll point out that the new section 6.4 describes a
consideration that largely stems from RFC 5451 as well.
No objection.
3. A few "Yes, adding this is groovy," messages would be good and all.
Yes, adding this is groovy indeed.
-Jim
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html