----- "Suresh Ramasubramanian" <ops(_dot_)lists(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com> wrote:
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 8:43 AM, Franck Martin <franck(_at_)genius(_dot_)com>
wrote:
Well you define the 2 difficulties:
1) Development costs of implementing a UI
... in an open source / freely available app like squirrelmail?
... as a 3rd party toolbar or extension for tbird / outlook?
... as a PART of outlook?
... as a part of the AOL client, or the hotmail / gmail / outblaze web UI?
Cost varies a lot, doesnt it?
None of the RFCs have trivial costs to implement
2) Relationship with the sender
2) if properly DKIM validated then there would be no need to define an out
of band relationship with the sended. DKIM with a special protocol should
be
Oh? So a spammer publishes some random stuff in a dkim record and I'm
supposed to believe it? Or c1t1b4nk.com publishes a dkim record with
a list unsubscribe and I'm supposed to do just what with it?
Well would you have allowed the email to reach the inbox in the first instance?
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html