with it? What will users see? Ask ten people, get ten answers, which
is about as far from interoperable as you can get.
I think the use of "interoperability" here is curious. What qualifies as
interoperable? According to the DKIM spec, if sizeof(message) = 10k and
l=100, then if the first 100 bytes were unchanged since signing, the
signature is valid, and I think everyone would agree that the verifiers would
all behave the same way.
You might get ten answers if you're asking about assessors, but I doubt you'd
get ten answers when you're talking about verifiers.
I thought you just said that you know people who reject signatures if the
l= covers less than some percentage of the message.
R's,
John
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html