On Jun 2, 2009, at 2:52 PM, John R. Levine wrote:
Your point about some assessors requring a signed subject is a good
example. It tells me that 4871 section 5.4 is underspecified, and
4871bis should strengthen it to say that you MUST sign the headers
that every message is supposed to have.
DKIM is not limited to just email. Even ADSP failed to limit its
assertions to just email. As such, what should unspecified message
formats contain?
-Doug
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html