-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Jun 2, 2009, at 4:04 AM, John Levine wrote:
My suggestion is to ask some implementers. If they think it made
implementing DKIM hard, or they see value to removing it, then do so.
The biggest problem with x= is that it mainly exists to support the
false belief that senders can tell recipients what to do.
I agree. As a receiver, I laugh in the face of the very notion that am
obligated to do anything with a message other than as I will.
Jon
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Universal 2.6.3
Charset: US-ASCII
wj8DBQFKJZ78sTedWZOD3gYRAqj9AJ0QSYS8WesurhwMvwPNMbfiliirkwCfTLqg
yeo8utzIclzimYPko37D6N8=
=LvlD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html