John Levine wrote:
The question remains: given a message with such a signature, which is
entirely valid in the current DKIM, what will a recipient system do
with it? What will users see? Ask ten people, get ten answers, which
is about as far from interoperable as you can get.
What's it to you? The assessment of validly signed DKIM messages is
now and always has been out of the scope of this working group. The
problem here is the notion that you warrant an answer to this question.
Mike
PS: will someone tell Levine to stop bouncing my messages? thx
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html