ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- l= and x=

2009-06-02 18:53:00
DKIM is not limited to just email.   Even ADSP failed to limit its
assertions to just email.  As such, what should unspecified message
formats contain?

One would think the "unspecified message formats" would have defining documents 
someplace that identify header fields that are supposed to be present to be 
compliant.  So the generic language John suggested seems fine to me.

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>