ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] list expanders (was Re: chained signatures, was l= summary)

2009-06-10 13:36:59
J.D. Falk wrote:
Charles Lindsey wrote:

What I think it makes clear that we are in serious need of some document
to provide Best Practice for how mailing list expanders should handle
DKIM, and I think that is something that this WG needs to take on board.

Feel free to use my article on CircleID as a starting point:

http://www.circleid.com/posts/dkim_for_discussion_lists/

It's so simple and obvious (once you move from theory to practice) that I'm 
not sure if it's worth the WG's time.

There is *NO* *REASON* to strip signatures. NONE.

In fact it is HARMFUL.


        Mike
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html