On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 15:34:19 +0100, Michael Thomas <mike(_at_)mtcc(_dot_)com>
wrote:
J.D. Falk wrote:
Michael Thomas wrote:
There is *NO* *REASON* to strip signatures. NONE.
In fact it is HARMFUL.
Well for starters, RFC4871 section 3.5:
And from RFC2822 section 3.6:
And then RFC4871 section 4.2 goes on to say:
In general +1 to all that, though I am not as passionate as Michael, and
can accept that hopelessly broken signatures _might_ occasionally be
removed.
But by and large, I do not want to prevent Forensics.
--
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131
Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl(_at_)clerew(_dot_)man(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html