+1
It seems to defeat the purpose and the chain of trust concept, although
I can see why some believe the chain of trust is preserved for a list
system - their own.
---
Michael Thomas wrote:
J.D. Falk wrote:
Charles Lindsey wrote:
What I think it makes clear that we are in serious need of some document
to provide Best Practice for how mailing list expanders should handle
DKIM, and I think that is something that this WG needs to take on board.
Feel free to use my article on CircleID as a starting point:
http://www.circleid.com/posts/dkim_for_discussion_lists/
It's so simple and obvious (once you move from theory to practice) that I'm
not sure if it's worth the WG's time.
There is *NO* *REASON* to strip signatures. NONE.
In fact it is HARMFUL.
Mike
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html