Wietse Venema wrote:
+0.99
This clarifies what is the primary identifier that signers
intend to send to assessors.
If it helps to avoid stepping on sensitive toes, you could drop
the last sentence, but I can live with it.
+1 (rounding up)
And, by the way, I'm speaking as operator of a popular reputation assessment
service.
--
J.D. Falk
Return Path Inc
http://www.returnpath.net/
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html