On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 17:57:57 -0000, <Bill(_dot_)Oxley(_at_)cox(_dot_)com> wrote:
Forensics and reporting is about all one can do with a broken signature
It's up to recipients. I they really care about whether some mesage was
genuine, they might find it worthwhile to try to deduce from the
diagnostic headers what had got lost/added, and then try to reverify a
corrected version.
A lot of work, but useful in some cases, and always useful to identify
sites that had caused the problem and for issuing LARTs accordingly.
--
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131
Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl(_at_)clerew(_dot_)man(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html