-----Original Message-----
From: Dave CROCKER [mailto:dhc(_at_)dcrocker(_dot_)net]
Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 11:53 AM
To: Murray S. Kucherawy
Cc: Mark Delany; IETF DKIM WG
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Broken signature analysis
The previous interop event targeted basic, direct signing and
validation. My
sense is that the interest now is extending utility, such as:
1) exploring interesting scenarios that seem to be causing
failures.
2) perhaps exploring use of d= subdomains for differentially
labeling
different sub-streams
3) exploring the use of multiple signatures
Now you're talking. And throw re-signing by lists in there as well. Oh, and
signing A-R header fields during relaying.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html