Re: [ietf-dkim] Broken signature analysis

In article <4B890E6D(_dot_)9090508(_at_)tana(_dot_)it> you write:
> On 24/Feb/10 20:55, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> > [...] Oh, and signing A-R header fields during relaying.
> Doesn't that conflict with the practice of removing A-Rs?
You only need to remove A-Rs that claim to be from you.

R's,
John
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html