Only if IDNA is incorporated in the DKIM signature verifier
-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
[mailto:ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Dave CROCKER
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2010 4:24 AM
To: ietf-dkim(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposed new charter
This is perhaps more relevant to a discussion about interoperability testing,
but I thought it worth raising also for the next round of specification, etc.
work:
Do we know whether DKIM works IDNs? If not, what should we do about that?
(I'm sitting in Apricot and this came up during an APCauce discussion.)
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html