Re: [ietf-dkim] IDNs, was Proposed new charter

On 3/3/2010 2:45 AM, John Levine wrote:
> This means that in DKIM, the d= value is a domain, it's punycoded, no
> question about that.

I don't recall that in the DKIM specification and I don't recall the part of 
the 
specification the dictates a context in which the punycode version is a given.

d/
-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html