RFC 4871, top sentence on page 20, in the description of d=
...
RFC 4871, second paragraph on page 21, in the description of i=
For the bis effort, I'd recommend this clarification. I think it would fall
within acceptable boundaries of change while going to Draft.
I agree the two sentences should say the same thing. Don't feel
strongly about the wording since the way UTF->punycode works is the
same for all domain names everywhere.
R's,
John
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html