--On 26 May 2010 11:48:53 -0700 Michael Thomas <mike(_at_)mtcc(_dot_)com> wrote:
Perhaps I'm missing something. I'm working with the mental model
that the underlying problem ADSP advocates would like to address
is phishing or brand protection, as they're the only concrete problems
I've seen mentioned.
So you're on a tangent about something that's not even vaguely in our
charter. ADSP doesn't claim to solve "phishing", it just allows
bit-for-bit domain names to be safely tossed if they don't have a
signature. How that integrates into the larger anti-phishing modules is
frankly where the secret sauce lies for vendors.
Addressing an issue and solving it aren't the same things. Heck, neither is
even a prerequisite for the other, given that some problems are
self-resolving or solved accidentally.
--
Ian Eiloart
IT Services, University of Sussex
01273-873148 x3148
For new support requests, see http://www.sussex.ac.uk/its/help/
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html