On 7/30/2010 9:26 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
No. DKIM doesn't really say much about either the From: address or the
Reply-To: address, so such a suggestion for "DKIM-friendly" behaviour
would be nonsensical.
It might be a reasonable suggestion for the benefit of other protocols,
but that's a different question.
Is it not an ADSP issue though? Covering ADSP issues is (at least
implicitly) in scope for this document.
This purporting to be a technical group, precision in the use of labels is
broadly viewed as a Good Thing.
If you want to characterize it as ADSP-friendly, that would be precise and
possibly accurate.
As Steve notes, this has nothing to do with DKIM and therefore must not be
labeled DKIM-friendly.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html