-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org [mailto:ietf-dkim-
bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Steve Atkins
Sent: Friday, July 30, 2010 8:48 AM
To: DKIM List
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Alternative MAiling List Approach
It may well be an ADSP issue - I've not looked in detail at the
proposal - and it may be in scope for this document. (I suspect
it's also a bad idea, but that's a separate discussion).
It's definitely not a DKIM issue, though, and any labeling of a
non-DKIM issue as "DKIM-friendly" would be misleading.
I concur that this specific issue is an ADSP one and not a DKIM (i.e. RFC4871)
one. I don't have any problem being more clear about that.
But I disagree that ADSP is out of scope in general (re: the ADSP is or is not
part of DKIM debate), unless we also want to remove all the other stuff in the
lists draft about ADSP that people generally seem to like (currently 27
instances).
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html