Re: [ietf-dkim] Alternative MAiling List Approach

On Jul 30, 2010, at 12:26 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org [mailto:ietf-dkim-
> > bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Steve Atkins
> > Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 8:56 PM
> > To: DKIM List
> > Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Alternative MAiling List Approach
> >
> > On Jul 29, 2010, at 3:45 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> > > Should the MLM draft suggest From: replacement and addition of Reply-
> > To: as a specific example of DKIM-friendly MLM behavior?
> >
> > No. DKIM doesn't really say much about either the From: address or the
> > Reply-To: address, so such a suggestion for "DKIM-friendly" behaviour
> > would be nonsensical.
> >
> > It might be a reasonable suggestion for the benefit of other protocols,
> > but that's a different question.
> Is it not an ADSP issue though?  Covering ADSP issues is (at least 
> implicitly) in scope for this document.
It may well be an ADSP issue - I've not looked in detail at the
proposal - and it may be in scope for this document. (I suspect
it's also a bad idea, but that's a separate discussion).

It's definitely not a DKIM issue, though, and any labeling of a
non-DKIM issue as "DKIM-friendly" would be misleading.

Cheers,
  Steve


_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html