Re: [ietf-dkim] MLMs and the use of multipart/alternative to preserve or

The proposal is to preserve the original message + DKIM signature and to 
add the new (probably partially rewritten) output message, combined into 
a multipart/alternative structure. The combined message is sent by the 
MLM to the recipient.


Once again, I can only see this as screwing up the 99+% of users for
whom the lists work just fine for the <1% who consider themselves so
important that they need to mark their list mail with ADSP.

Imagine you're a list manager.  Your list has 1000 subscribers.  Two
of them demand that you do something to prevent address forgery due to
forged unsigned messages, a problem that you have never observed to
happen on your lists.  What do you do?  I know what I'd do.

R's,
John
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[ietf-dkim] MLMs and the use of multipart/alternative to preserve original DKIM signature and at the same time add a new DKIM signature, Rolf E. Sonneveld Re: [ietf-dkim] MLMs and the use of multipart/alternative to preserve original DKIM signature and at the same time add a new DKIM signature, Steve Atkins Re: [ietf-dkim] MLMs and the use of multipart/alternative to preserve original DKIM signature and at the same time add a new DKIM signature, Rolf E. Sonneveld Re: [ietf-dkim] MLMs and the use of multipart/alternative to preserve original DKIM signature and at the same time add a new DKIM signature, John Levine <= Re: [ietf-dkim] MLMs and the use of multipart/alternative to preserve original DKIM signature and at the same time add a new DKIM signature, Rolf E. Sonneveld Re: [ietf-dkim] MLMs and the use of multipart/alternative to preserve original DKIM signature and at the same time add a new DKIM signature, Hector Santos Re: [ietf-dkim] MLMs and the use of multipart/alternative to preserve original DKIM signature and at the same time add a new DKIM signature, Rolf E. Sonneveld Re: [ietf-dkim] MLMs and the use of multipart/alternative to preserve original DKIM signature and at the same time add a new DKIM signature, Scott Kitterman Message not available Re: [ietf-dkim] MLMs and the use of multipart/alternative to preserve original DKIM signature and at the same time add a new DKIM signature, Hector Santos Re: [ietf-dkim] MLMs and the use of multipart/alternative to preserve original DKIM signature and at the same time add a new DKIM signature, Bill.Oxley Re: [ietf-dkim] MLMs and the use of multipart/alternative to preserve original DKIM signature and at the same time add a new DKIM signature, Rolf E. Sonneveld Re: [ietf-dkim] MLMs and the use of multipart/alternative to preserve original DKIM signature and at the same time add a new DKIM signature, Bill.Oxley Re: [ietf-dkim] MLMs and the use of multipart/alternative to preserve original DKIM signature and at the same time add a new DKIM signature, John R. Levine Re: [ietf-dkim] MLMs and the use of multipart/alternative to preserve original DKIM signature and at the same time add a new DKIM signature, Murray S. Kucherawy

Re: [ietf-dkim] MLMs and the use of multipart/alternative to preserve original DKIM signature and at the same time add a new DKIM signature