ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] MLMs and the use of multipart/alternative to preserve original DKIM signature and at the same time add a new DKIM signature

2010-08-03 11:20:01
-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org [mailto:ietf-dkim-
bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Rolf E. Sonneveld
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 6:30 AM
To: Bill Oxley @ Cox
Cc: ietf-dkim(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] MLMs and the use of multipart/alternative to
preserve original DKIM signature and at the same time add a new DKIM
signature

Or is the general consensus that (in the long run) the reputation of
the
MLM domain is sufficient for the verifier/receiver of MLM distributed
mail? I don't read that in the draft.

That's definitely my forward-looking view, but it's hard to include text in a 
document that points to something in the future with any degree of certainty.

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>