-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org [mailto:ietf-dkim-
bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Michael Thomas
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 7:59 AM
To: Rolf E. Sonneveld
Cc: ietf-dkim(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] MLMs and the use of multipart/alternative to
preserve original DKIM signature and at the same time add a new DKIM
signature
When we wrote our dkim implementation, we did a bunch of work within
the
existing DKIM framework (using l= and z=) that allowed us to get most
original signatures to reverify through mailing lists (~95%). No work
needed on the mailing list software at all.
But didn't we also say that such reverified signatures don't get any additional
meaning with 'z=' reprocessing?
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html