-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org [mailto:ietf-dkim-
bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Dave CROCKER
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 7:06 AM
To: DKIM IETF WG
Subject: [ietf-dkim] Splitting the mailing list document?
c. Best practices for Mailing List Managers
If the document has indeed wandered off into this more general area (and I'd
have to re-read it to find the parts you're talking about), we should reel it
back in. I don't want to maintain a general treatise on how MLMs should behave
unless perhaps I manage to enlist some co-authors of major current MLMs to do
so.
I think the other two are within scope and would probably be fine to include in
a single document.
The latter two have emerged. Neither is formally within scope of the
working
group, although b. is a natural addition. Note, however, that it is
formal
protocol specification work and we need to worry about adoption first -
- who
needs to adopt it and why do we think they will?
Is that really true? The document is informational and is deliberately
avoiding being normative about anything. Its posture is intended to convey
experience of the industry so far in deploying DKIM and MLMs in tandem, and
provide some suggestions of how that co-operation could be improved.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html