ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposed changes to MLM draft

2010-08-31 06:43:00
On Tuesday 31 August 2010 04:03:45 Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
I'd like some help tackling the next version of the MLM draft.  People seem
to have varying ideas about what should be removed and perhaps appear in
other documents now.  I need some consensus on a direction in which to
proceed.

So can I please get some +1s/-1s on each of the following:

(1) Split the document into three documents: A DKIM MLM BCP that discusses
signing and verifying in the context of MLMs with no value-add items
addressed, a DKIM MLM Informational that discusses possible value-add
enhancements to MLMs in the DKIM world, and a non-WG BCP about mailing
lists irrespective of DKIM (Dave's proposal);

-1. A single document is good for implementors.

(2) Tear out everything having to do with making author signatures survive
list relaying, dropping all that text altogether, and instead pointing
people at S/MIME or PGP (John's proposal);

-1. Surviving signatures seems like a good long term goal.

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html