On Tuesday 31 August 2010 04:03:45 Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
I'd like some help tackling the next version of the MLM draft. People seem
to have varying ideas about what should be removed and perhaps appear in
other documents now. I need some consensus on a direction in which to
proceed.
So can I please get some +1s/-1s on each of the following:
(1) Split the document into three documents: A DKIM MLM BCP that discusses
signing and verifying in the context of MLMs with no value-add items
addressed, a DKIM MLM Informational that discusses possible value-add
enhancements to MLMs in the DKIM world, and a non-WG BCP about mailing
lists irrespective of DKIM (Dave's proposal);
-1. A single document is good for implementors.
(2) Tear out everything having to do with making author signatures survive
list relaying, dropping all that text altogether, and instead pointing
people at S/MIME or PGP (John's proposal);
-1. Surviving signatures seems like a good long term goal.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html