Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
If you advocate for a general MLM BCP, this will be a non-WG document
(it's outside of our charter) so I'd love to get some MLM operators
and developers involved. (Maybe this should take place on ietf-822
or maybe on a new non-WG list; suggestions welcome.) Expressions
of interest in that work would be appreciated. I'll approach the
APPS ADs about a venue.
The DKIM WG charter includes LIST operations support.
5. Consider issues related to mailing lists, beyond what is
already documented. This includes considerations for mailing
list software that supports or intends to support DKIM, as well
as considerations for DKIM/ADSP deployment in the presence of
mailing lists that do not have such support. Include
recommendations in the informational documents, or produce a
new informational document about mailing-list considerations.
Therefore your MLM would be very appropriate.
Mr. Crocker says this is a distracting from "our current work." Mr.
Crocker should be reminded what is out of scope per the charter:
* Reputation and accreditation systems. While we expect these to
add value to what is defined by the DKIM working group, their
development will be separate, and is out of scope for the DKIM
working group.
The on-going changes in the DKIM draft standard documentations and
specification semantics all related to reputation has been a major
distraction, hindrance and road block in completed chartered goals.
--
Hector Santos, CTO
http://www.santronics.com
http://santronics.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html