On 8/30/10 12:08 PM, Hector Santos wrote:
Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
So can I please get some +1s/-1s on each of the following:
(1) Split the document into three documents: A DKIM MLM BCP that
discusses signing and verifying in the context of MLMs with no
value-add items addressed, a DKIM MLM Informational that
discusses possible value-add enhancements to MLMs in the DKIM world, and
a non-WG BCP about mailing lists irrespective of DKIM (Dave's proposal);
-1. Please no more delays! Dave's suggestions are not required to fix
a problem. Your MLM is designed to FIX conflicts with current WG
documents.
(2) Tear out everything having to do with making author signatures
survive list relaying, dropping all that text altogether, and
instead pointing people at S/MIME or PGP (John's proposal);
-2. There are two parts to the above:
-1. ADSP guidelines is a required engineering consideration for MLM.
To remove can create interoperability problems.
-1. Please No more dependencies on other technologies based on highly
subjective non-scientific presumptions.
Agreed.
-Doug
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html