On 8/30/2010 11:42 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
I'd suggest that the second item actually be a normative specification of
value-added features. This requires a change to the charter, and so it
would have to wait until completing the current charter.
If it's a minor charter tweak, maybe we could start that process before
then?
'minor' and 'charter change' in the same sentence constitute an oxymoron. it's
a formal ietf process.
perhaps more importantly, i'll suggest it's a distraction from our current work.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html