Dave,
On 08/30/2010 08:40 PM, Dave CROCKER wrote:
On 8/30/2010 11:03 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
I’d like some help tackling the next version of the MLM draft. People seem
to
have varying ideas about what should be removed and perhaps appear in other
documents now. I need some consensus on a direction in which to proceed.
So can I please get some +1s/-1s on each of the following:
(1) Split the document into three documents: A DKIM MLM BCP that discusses
signing and verifying in the context of MLMs with no value-add items
addressed,
a DKIM MLM Informational that discusses possible value-add enhancements to
MLMs
in the DKIM world, and a non-WG BCP about mailing lists irrespective of DKIM
(Dave’s proposal);
+1
I'd suggest that the second item actually be a normative specification of
value-added features. This requires a change to the charter, and so it would
have to wait until completing the current charter.
can you elaborate on what, in your view, would be part of this normative
specification?
/rolf
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html