Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis

On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 1:19 PM, Dave CROCKER <dhc(_at_)dcrocker(_dot_)net> 
wrote:
> To make sure I understand the intent:  move the set of subsections that
> introduce higher-level constructs, to come before the sub-sections that
> define syntactic elements?
>
> Sounds like an improvement to me.
Yes and thanks!

-- 
Jeff Macdonald
Ayer, MA

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html