Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-vesely-dkim-joint-sigs

> > Ian, this makes no sense to me. If a signing domain is concerned enough
> > to choose to implement ADSP, why would they reduce what they are signing
> > to accommodate a small percentage of their mail going to MLMs that they
> > may or may not be able to identify?
I'm with you.  All of this emphasis on complex designs for MLMs strikes me 
as a waste of time, since it's a tiny corner of the mail space that has 
not historically been a vector for abuse, and shows no sign of becoming 
one.
That's why my advice is that lists should sign their mail, which is easy 
and at worst harmless, and we're done.
R's,
John

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html