ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] SPF/DKIM complementary failure scenarios?

2010-11-24 14:45:15
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 10:57:58AM -0800, Douglas Otis allegedly wrote:
On 11/24/10 9:01 AM, Dave CROCKER wrote:

 On 11/23/2010 3:14 AM, Ian Eiloart wrote:
Actually, they're complementary. In places where DKIM fails
(mailing lists rewriting messages), SPF can succeed. And in places
where SPF fails (message forwarding), DKIM can succeed.

 This assertion of facts is almost certainly incorrect.

 Please specify the details of the scenarios in which you claim these
 assertions are correct.

+1

-10 Please don't. It's out of scope for this group.


Mark.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html