-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
[mailto:ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Dave CROCKER
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2011 2:14 PM
To: DKIM IETF WG
Subject: [ietf-dkim] Ticket #19
The best I can suggest is something along the lines of noting that
assessment-level heuristics can be aided by certain choices of signature d=
names. And then specifying what they might be, so that both signers and
verifiers know how to encourage success for the heuristics.
But doesn't the proposed text do that?
Perhaps a merge of that text and this paragraph would do nicely.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html