-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
[mailto:ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Dave CROCKER
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2011 2:17 PM
To: DKIM IETF WG
Subject: [ietf-dkim] Ticket #11
Maybe it can be reworded:
A single domain name that is the mandatory payload output of DKIM and
that refers to the identity claiming responsibility for the signed
message introduced into the mail stream.
+1
This nicely removes reference to the act of introducing and, indeed, that act
isn't really what DKIM covers, per se.
However I suggest adding the usual waffling qualifier:
claiming (some) responsibility
I think we should drop "signed" from it, since that's what the entire
specification is about in the first place.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html