ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Ticket #11

2011-04-26 16:25:21
-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org 
[mailto:ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Dave CROCKER
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2011 2:17 PM
To: DKIM IETF WG
Subject: [ietf-dkim] Ticket #11

Maybe it can be reworded:

    A single domain name that is the mandatory payload output of DKIM and
    that refers to the identity claiming responsibility for the signed
    message introduced into the mail stream.

+1

This nicely removes reference to the act of introducing and, indeed, that act
isn't really what DKIM covers, per se.

However I suggest adding the usual waffling qualifier:

    claiming (some) responsibility

I think we should drop "signed" from it, since that's what the entire 
specification is about in the first place.

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>