ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Ticket #11

2011-04-27 04:38:17
On 26/Apr/11 23:50, MH Michael Hammer (5304) wrote:
However I suggest adding the usual waffling qualifier:

    claiming (some) responsibility

I think we should drop "signed" from it, since that's what the entire
specification is about in the first place.


I think it is better to leave "signed" in. It is explicit and correct.

Could be more explicit:

  A single domain name that is the mandatory payload output of DKIM
  and that refers to the identity claiming some responsibility for
  the message by signing it.

(I've left off "introduced into the mail stream.")
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>