On 04/27/2011 09:53 AM, Dave CROCKER wrote:
With that sort of documented history, the responsibility to claim otherwise
falls on the critic. Otherwise the wg is essentially being asked to prove a
negative and almost serves as a DOS attack...
Denial of service on what/whom? As far as I can see, the
only thing that this effort is serving is the process itself.
It certainly isn't helping DKIM.
Complaining is easy. Trying to put the work on others is easy. Doing
foundational work to support a claim is not.
This is rich coming from somebody who's never written a
DKIM stack to somebody who wrote the first.
Mike
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html