Dave CROCKER wrote:
The best I can suggest is something along the lines of noting that
assessment-level heuristics can be aided by certain choices of signature d=
names. And then specifying what they might be, so that both signers and
verifiers know how to encourage success for the heuristics.
mumble.
Chuckling. Warning: Such mumbles only presage more far-reaching
developments to come. :)
There will always be a choice or choices for the selection of a SDID
that will reflect a controlled decision for the equal or better
outcome, hopefully not worst. I don't see this done in random.
--
HLS
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html