On 4/27/11 12:47 PM, Hector Santos wrote:
Rolf E. Sonneveld wrote:
-1. I suggest to add clarifications etc. to a future update of
RFC5863 (deployment and operations document).
So you agree clarification is required but not for RFC4871bis?
No. Just: IF clarification is required, it has to be in an
operations-/Informational- /BCP-type document. Together with some other
DKIM related DNS advise (for example: last couple of months I came
across three different cases of DNS admins, which broke up DKIM (and
SPF) records in multiple pieces enclosed by double-quotes, as their DNS
management interface didn't support input of long records).
Interesting. Lets see:
1) A few words clarification for DKIM-BASE standard. A little
confusion for Windows people and domains using
ISP managed DNS zones.
Well, maybe it's time Windows people leave their .local zones and
discover a whole world beyond those windows...
/rolf
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html