ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Ticket #10: public key example -- no change needed

2011-04-27 08:25:09
On 4/27/11 12:47 PM, Hector Santos wrote:
Rolf E. Sonneveld wrote:

-1. I suggest to add clarifications etc. to a future update of 
RFC5863 (deployment and operations document).

So you agree clarification is required but not for RFC4871bis?

No. Just: IF clarification is required, it has to be in an 
operations-/Informational- /BCP-type document. Together with some other 
DKIM related DNS advise (for example: last couple of months I came 
across three different cases of DNS admins, which broke up DKIM (and 
SPF) records in multiple pieces enclosed by double-quotes, as their DNS 
management interface didn't support input of long records).


Interesting. Lets see:

1) A few words clarification for DKIM-BASE standard. A little
   confusion for Windows people and domains using
   ISP managed DNS zones.

Well, maybe it's time Windows people leave their .local zones and 
discover a whole world beyond those windows...

/rolf

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html